On Sun, 9 Mar 1997, Mike Jones wrote:
> however, it's nanotech content should be downgraded to a 2. It was
> mentioned several times, but had very little to do with the primary
> plotline.
That isn't a requirement for getting the rating of 4. Queen City Jazz didn't have much to do with Nan, but if I remember correctly it also has a rating of 4. Is there a possibilty that we could restucture the rating system? Including how good the book actually was, and the nanotech content.
>
> Mike Jones
> mrjones@hiwaay.net
>