> :> :> The reverse idea, that memes effect genes, is called the Baldwin Effect.
> :> :
> :> :Two possible interpretation to "memes effect genes":
> :> :1. The actual content of memes is saved into genetic information.
> :> :2. Memes effect our selection of mates, thereby effecting the genetical information of our
> :> :off-springs.
> :>
> :> Neither of these is the Baldwin Effect.
> :>
> :> The Baldwin Effect works like this:
> :> Memes can effect the environment an creature lives in or can move the creature to new
> :> environments.  As the creature environment changes, genes which may have been adaptive in
> :> the old environment may be maladaptive or useless in the new environment and genes which
> :> were maladaptive or useless in the old environment may be very adaptive in the new
> :> environment.  The selection preasures of the new environment will favor those individuals
> :> with genes that work in the new environment.  The evolution of the creature changes because
> :> of the new environment and it was the memes that created the new environment or moved the
> :> creature to that environment.
> :
> :I think the above description reduces to #2.  However, it is an
> :improvement over the naive one by demonstrating how the effect is
> :pervasive and indirect.
> 
> #2 discusses memes and sexual selection, a relationship I believe to be weak.  The Baldwin Effect 
> deals with learning.  When memes which effect the evolution of a species are learned, this is the 
> Baldwin Effect.  An example of this is when Homo Habilis learned to eat meat 1.2 million years 
> ago.  This learned behavior had a drastic effect of the evolution of Homo Habilis, Homo Erectus, 
> Homo Sapien Neanderthals, Homo Sapien Sapien and Homo Sapien Sapien Deus.
If #2 discusses memes with respect to sexual selection specifically, 
that is highly invisible to me.  I agree that sexual selection is relatively 
weak compared to memetically-driven enviroforming, which is also 
subsumed under #2 by directly altering the pool of mates to choose from.
[The description doesn't say HOW the choice is affected!]
I would classify your example as an instance of memetically-driven 
enviroforming, which feeds directly into my current interpretation of #2.
[Oh, 'enviroforming'. I need 'terraforming', only more generic: 
alteration of the environment.  Direction of change need not have a 
normative evaluation.  Is there a more typical word out there?]
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/   Towards the conversion of data into information....
/
/   Kenneth Boyd
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////