>Also, memetic reasoning does not have full support in level-2, so it is
>not surprising that many people on this list can do level-3 emulation.
>People closer to statistically-normal [note that we are trying to change
>this!] who actually have seen me analyze situations invariably have
>problems replicating the reasoning I used independently.
It immediately reminds me of a story told by Marsha Sinetar in her book:
"Developing a 21-st Century Mind" :
-----
And Jesus said unto them: "Who do you say I am?"
And they replied, "You are the eschatological manifestation of the ground
of our being; the kermygma in which we find the ultimate meaning of our
interpersonal relationship."
And Jesus said, "What?"
-----
What do you say, Richard?
>Those are very mild compared to the ones I had to deal with. Besides, I
>think a deeper analysis would severely compromise the usefulness of the
>examples quoted, in those circumstances.
>
>One of the hardest parts of this shift was unlearning the use of
>willpower. It is almost always less taxing to directly
>construct/destroy motivation than to use vastly inadequate willpower.
>to deflect an unwanted motive.
Am I the only one who does not have a clue what Ken is talking about and
everybody alse is already on level-3 ?
---------------------
Tad Niwinski from TeTa where people grow
3.1415926535897932
There is no Absolute Truth, although we are getting closer and closer to IT.