> Here's some fodder on the subject of decisions being made before the
> conscious mind is made aware of them.  This is why I think limiting the
> scope of memes to linguistic information is in error.  We may need to talk
> about something like "proto-memes" in the future.  A "proto-meme" being
> (my definition here, folks) information that spreads in accordance with
> the model of memes, yet is non-(or proto-)linguistic in nature. 
I won't feel this need: I've seen *lots* of memetic information encoded 
in a nonlinguistic method.  However, the scope expansion is a good idea.
[CLIP]
> This is from a paper on Synesthesia by Richard E. Cytowic, M.D., author of
> "The Man Who Tasted Shapes", a good laymans introduction to the primacy of
> the paleo-mammalian brain (limbic system) over the cortex.
> 
> (Sorry, in advance, about the length.  I clipped as much as I could
> without losing context.) 
> 
>      _________________________________________________________________
>                                       
>    Synesthesia: Phenomenology And Neuropsychology
>    A review of current knowledge
>    
>    Richard E. Cytowic 1995
[CLIP]
>    8.2 The word "multiplex" is usually applied to contemporary concepts
>    of brain organization that take into account volume transmission,
>    distributed systems, non-linear dynamics, and the thermodynamic energy
>    costs of any given biologic neural process. Such newer models remain
>    largely unknown, a surprising unfamiliarity given their implications -
>    for example, that we are irrational creatures by design and that
>    emotion, not reason, may play the decisive role both in how we think
>    and act. Additionally, our brains are not passive receivers of energy
>    flux, but dynamic explorers that actively seek out the stimuli that
>    interest them and determine their own contexts for perception. Ommaya
>    (in press) has elegantly articulated a number of powerful
>    contradictions in conventional models of brain organization that led
>    to his reevaluation of the role of emotion in cognition and behavior.
>    Indeed, he describes consciousness as "a type of emotion," and one of
>    emotion's roles as a "cognitive homeostat".
The lack of recognition of this model may have something to do with 
psychiatric diagnoses.  Someone who *consciously* uses this metaphor 
*will* have at least mild functional evidence of Attention Deficit 
Disorder.
After all, consciously multiplexed attention *will* prevent sustained 
attention in most academic settings.  [Graduate school is the first 
place I've been in where the instructors ignore the techniques 
required to capture everything on the board--such as the stack 
of totally irrelevant notes in parallel with the class notes.]
Having extreme emotional reactions to mistakes in one's work can be 
useful in preventing them.
>    8.5 I am hardly rejecting either reason or the role of the neocortex
>    in objective assessment or assigning meaning. Though we quickly speak
>    of reason dominating emotion, the reverse is actually true: the limbic
>    brain easily overwhelms thinking. 
So "We" propagate this myth so strongly that the physical reality is 
implausible?
>    8.8 Emotion did not get left behind in evolution. Reason and emotion
>    evolved together and their neural substrates are densely
>    interconnected. Yet each concerns itself with a different task. The
>    word "salience", which means to "leap up" or "stick out", describes
>    how the limbic brain alerts us to what is meaningful. We might say
>    that the emotional brain deals with qualitatively significant
>    information.
Such as: "I have just written down an error in this mathematics proof."
>    8.9 The limbic brain's use of common structures for different
>    functions such as memory, emotion, and attention may partly explain
>    why humans excel at making decisions based on incomplete information,
>    "acting on our hunches." We know more than we think we know. And yet
>    are we not always surprised at our insights, inspirations, and
>    creativity? And do we not just as often reject our direct experience
>    in favor of "objective facts" instead?
I.e., let beliefs about Objective Reality dominate current Subjective 
reality?  There are many uses for this.
[CLIP]
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/   Towards the conversion of data into information....
/
/   Kenneth Boyd
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////