>Do we want to make 'free will' an attribute only of memetic environments?
>i.e. can anything else have free will? A more serious problem is we can't
>know the future state of anything precisely, so this definition isn't too
>useful.
Which is pretty much why I want people to stop using the word. As far as I'm
concerned, free will is an illusion, and is not useful as a term, so we
shouldn't really worry about keeping it in usage very much.
>How about definining 'free will' in terms of control and/or influence
>rather than predictability?
I wouldn't want to... how would you do that?
Dave Pape
============================================================================
Limit the Fun. Prescribe the Fun. DESTROY THE FUN!
-(Southport & Formby Round Table Association slogan, 1994-1995)
Phonecalls: 0118 9583727 Phights: 20 Armadale Court
Westcote Road
Reading RG30 2DF