Subject: Re: virus: 500 dollar reward
>David McF. wrote:
>>First, how do you justify your assertion that only the axioms of
objectivism
>>are valid in philosophy?
>I worded that wrong, too. It is possible to have different valid sets of
>philosophical axioms than those of objectivism. These sets of axioms
might not
>contradict each other, like they can in math, but they can be distinct
sets. In
>fact, I know of a guy who has axioms that are different from (and which
I like
>better than) those of Ayn Rand. (This also addresses Robin's point.)
-David
Please elaborate on the alternate set of axioms you like better.
James Wright