Re: virus: 500 dollar reward

Tadeusz Niwinski (tad@teta.ai)
Mon, 17 Mar 1997 02:43:41 -0800

David McF wrote:
>At 12:57 AM 16/03/97 -0800, Tadeusz Niwinski wrote:
>
>>>Yes. So what is your analysis using Level-3 or post-rational thinking? Is
>>>it possible for David R.'s axioms to be neither mutually justifying nor
>>>unjustified? If so, how? (I'm looking for more than your assertion here.)
>>
>>Of course it is. A Level-3 mind sees its memetic programming as
>>a collection of different, possibly conflicting ways to map Objective
>>Reality (if it chooses to use that distinction-meme).
>>
>>Possible, justifying, unjustified -- these are all distinction-memes.
>
>Sure, but how does that show that David R.'s axioms can be neither
>justified nor unjustified? Are you saying that they can be both,
>or that they are neither if we dispense with the categories?

I'm not being deliberately evasive, but the questions you ask cannot
be answered in a satisfying way in a level-2 framework.

David, you have a Level-2 understanding of those axioms. It has nothing to
do with Level-3 consciousness, which is being at cause in your life. Have
you heard of meme-space flexing exercises? Try them.

Regards, Tadeusz (Tad) Niwinski from planet TeTa
tad@teta.ai http://www.teta.ai (604) 985-4159