Re: virus: Urban Legends

David McFadzean (david@lucifer.com)
Sat, 22 Mar 1997 17:16:21 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David McFadzean: "Re: Back to free will (was Re: virus: Fights)"
Previous message: Dave Pape: "Re: Back to free will (was Re: virus: Fights)"
Maybe in reply to: Reed Konsler: "virus: Urban Legends"
Next in thread: CardSharks@aol.com: "Re: virus: Urban Legends"

At 10:43 PM 22/03/97 GMT, Dave Pape wrote:
>Surely that should read "virulence"? "Virility" would be how manly it is...
>and while cutting people's livers out so often that the government start
>issuiung warnings is pretty fcken manly, I reckon "virulence" resonates more
>with our virus-related vocabulary. ;)

Yes, virulent is what I meant. (Memetic software error :-)

--
David McFadzean                 david@lucifer.com
Memetic Engineer                http://www.lucifer.com/~david/
Church of Virus                 http://www.lucifer.com/virus/

Next message: David McFadzean: "Re: Back to free will (was Re: virus: Fights)"
Previous message: Dave Pape: "Re: Back to free will (was Re: virus: Fights)"
Maybe in reply to: Reed Konsler: "virus: Urban Legends"
Next in thread: CardSharks@aol.com: "Re: virus: Urban Legends"