Re: virus: Tabacco mind virus.

Tony Hindle (t.hindle@joney.demon.co.uk)
Fri, 1 Aug 1997 05:23:10 +0100


In message <33DF0717.2C67412E@tripod.net>, Drakir <Drahcir@tripod.net>
writes
>Tony Hindle wrote:
>> I just think it would be cool to save a few lives.
>
>Fair enough, I suppose. OK, then start engineering this meme. Why
>should people not smoke? I don't think kill the tobacco plc people is
>the correct approach to prevention of smoking.

I agree, but its a much more difficult job to help people to
give up, I cant think of anything god at the moment.
>
>That's why it would be so easy to kill them all off before they got
>anywhere near a tobacco giant.

Actually its the people who accept money to spread pro-tabacco
propoganda that would make sensible tergets.
>
>Increase in security doesn't have to be obvious. After all, how many
>tobacco giants do you know of that make regular public appearances?

As I said the spokespeople would make sensible targets, ans they
apear publicaly quite often.

>>
>Wrong! If we can engineer the memes for the next generation to move
>away from Nuclear arms and into better democracy, then we can do
>something NOW HERE about it. In fact, I reckon that we stand more
>chance of that than we do of building an anti-smoking meme. After all,
>nuclear arms aren't addictive!

OK then you start, create a meme that might do some good, I cant
think of anything.
>>
>> Better to do nothing than to work for genicide incorporated.
>
>I disagree, but that's just a personal opinion.

I know you are joking of course, no matter how hard you try you
can only be a nice compassionate guy. Its just a shame that tabacco inc
have subverted you to do their nasty work for them.

Tony Hindle.