-Prof. Tim
Prof. Tim,
Do you mean that it happened by chance (accident)...that there is no meaning
or purpose (only that it was never destroyed by something stronger)...that
we can only evaluate it by its subsequent effect (it's usefulness to
ourselves in making whatever point we want to make so that we can compete
and kill others who use different interpretations)? If that is what you
mean by "Darwinian", then I don't think that the rest of my post backs up
that interpretation.
Brett
At 10:39 AM 8/13/97 -0700, you wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Aug 1997, Tim Rhodes wrote:
>> The roles of King and Fool *developed*[1] side by side
>> and hand in hand. Like those of the ant and the acacia.
>Sorry, forgot the footnote:
>[1] as you go on to suggest, Brett, and is consistant with a Darwinian
>model of development.
>-Prof. Tim
Returning,
rBERTS%n
Rabble Sonnet Retort
Take what you can use and let the rest go by.
KEN KESEY