> Well, it doesn't apply, really, because the shaman does not work _for_
> his client.
Cop out, Wade! If the "client" of a doctor doesn't inquire about his own
treatment, is it the doctors fault? Lazy patients get the treatment they
get. The "client" has to take responsiblity for himself at some point.
> And I would doubt he works _with_ the client either.
>
> Does the shaman even care about the needs or wants of the client? I
would
> say no.
And I'd say, "Hold on to that thought, Wade, I'll go get my truck!"
-Prof. Tim