>Tim is not Reed, but A is still A.
>
>Tim and Reed, for the sake of memetics, please, both of you, name your
>children A. If some idiot confuses one A with the other A we will finally
>have a living proof that the axiom of identity does not hold in real life
>(providing we will have a definition of "real" by then).
>
>Does it sound like a good memetical experiment?
This from the person who claimed that David R. was a constructed
identity of Richard's...as if it made any difference.
Reed
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Reed Konsler konsler@ascat.harvard.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------------