>Better make up new ones than use old ones, whose
>meanings the rest of us think we know, with new
>meanings.
How many words have a single meaning? I would guess none.
I think people are a lot more adaptable then you give them
credit for.
>There is concensus meaning of "real" is not well
>defined. That does not mean it does not exist, or
>that it has no uses. Your explanation of "objectively
>real" mentioned agreement among observers.
I suggested that objective reality is consistent. That isn't
meant to be a definition of objective reality, it is (possibly)
a property of objective reality.
-- David McFadzean david@lucifer.com Memetic Engineer http://www.lucifer.com/~david/ Church of Virus http://www.lucifer.com/virus/