It wasn't supposed to.
>counterexample which *might* be wrong--but wouldn't it be interesting if it
>were true?!?
>
>All ancestors have a (one) common human descendent.
>
>Based on the accepted nature of the first statement, and on the processes of
>logic (this would be associative? communicative? inductive? deductive?); I
>would have to say that the second statement is true--at least in theory.
If all D have an A, then all A have a D? I think there might be something
wrong with your logic.
-- David McFadzean david@lucifer.com Memetic Engineer http://www.lucifer.com/~david/ Church of Virus http://www.lucifer.com/virus/