>Is there anyone here who asserts that? What are you talking about?
>Richard Brodie
List,
I think I proposed a similar idea in the thread "Re: Virus: SM" on Mon,
29 Sep 1997 23:17:57 -0500 (below).
"So, given n-time, there are n(squared) number of possibilities wherein the
population and the individual contain both "all" and "one" minus "common"
ancestral lineages as is verified by the concept of x-time."
Although the system used to come up with this conclusion may be uniquely
suited to my own metaphysical outlook, I have used it to satisfy myself that
McFadzean's assertion (above) is correct. I go on record as agreeing with
the statement. Further, I think the point is important and relevant (is not
a "straw man").
Brett
Returning,
rBERTS%n
Rabble Sonnet Retort
"Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns
it, and finds himself no wiser than before," Bokonon tells
us. "He is full of murderous resentment of people who are
ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard
way."
Kurt Vonnegut, "Cat's Cradle"