Nathaniel Hall wrote:
> chardin wrote:
>
> > > Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 23:58:40 -0600
> > > From: Nathaniel Hall <natehall@worldnet.att.net>
> > > To: virus@lucifer.com
> > > Subject: Re: virus:Logic
> > > Reply-to: virus@lucifer.com
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Marie Foster wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am going to risk it and sling in my thoughts about science -
> > > > religion. It seems to me that both are attempts to explain the
> > > > existence of the energy we seem to agree exists. How well or poorly
> > > > either does this has to do more with the power structure that uses ( or
> > > > misuses) the insights gained.
> > >
> > > Insights gained? One gets insight when one uses ones eyes to see (science)
> > > not when one shuts them (religion). Power structure? Who controls your
> > > thoughts when you choose to think freely? Who controls your thoughts when
> > > your a cult member?The Nateman, waiting for the inquisition.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Nateman, does the term " Pascal's Wager" mean anything to you?
>
> > If
> > you are right, I have no worries. From the primordial slime we came
> > and to the dust of the grave I shall return. If we are
> > right....you could be in biggg trouble!
> > Never mind that the Pope said there was a special place in hell for
> > Pascal. :)
>
> I could not have faith even if I wanted to. It's simply not in my nature. If you
> think I'm in big trouble check out this guy:
> http://members.iquest.net/~teevie/sagan.html
Whoops! Screwed the link up . This is the fixed version on top.The Nateman
--------------EB57CC446C9CC376F10250AD
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Nathaniel Hall wrote:
chardin wrote:Whoops! Screwed the link up . This is the fixed version on top.The Nateman --------------EB57CC446C9CC376F10250AD--> > Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 23:58:40 -0600
> > From: Nathaniel Hall <natehall@worldnet.att.net>
> > To: virus@lucifer.com
> > Subject: Re: virus:Logic
> > Reply-to: virus@lucifer.com
>
> >
> >
> > Marie Foster wrote:
> >
> > > I am going to risk it and sling in my thoughts about science -
> > > religion. It seems to me that both are attempts to explain the
> > > existence of the energy we seem to agree exists. How well or poorly
> > > either does this has to do more with the power structure that uses ( or
> > > misuses) the insights gained.
> >
> > Insights gained? One gets insight when one uses ones eyes to see (science)
> > not when one shuts them (religion). Power structure? Who controls your
> > thoughts when you choose to think freely? Who controls your thoughts when
> > your a cult member?The Nateman, waiting for the inquisition.
> >
> >
> >
> Nateman, does the term " Pascal's Wager" mean anything to you?> If
> you are right, I have no worries. From the primordial slime we came
> and to the dust of the grave I shall return. If we are
> right....you could be in biggg trouble!
> Never mind that the Pope said there was a special place in hell for
> Pascal. :)I could not have faith even if I wanted to. It's simply not in my nature. If you
think I'm in big trouble check out this guy:
http://members.iquest.net/~teevie/sagan.html