Re: virus:Logic

Nathaniel Hall (natehall@worldnet.att.net)
Wed, 08 Oct 1997 20:17:55 -0600


--------------A637247A7274EA17C28A80C2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Nathaniel Hall wrote:

>
>
> Nathaniel Hall wrote:
>
>> chardin wrote:
>>
>> > > Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 23:58:40 -0600
>> > > From: Nathaniel Hall <natehall@worldnet.att.net>
>> > > To: virus@lucifer.com
>> > > Subject: Re: virus:Logic
>> > > Reply-to: virus@lucifer.com
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Marie Foster wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I am going to risk it and sling in my thoughts about science -
>>
>> > > > religion. It seems to me that both are attempts to explain
>> the
>> > > > existence of the energy we seem to agree exists. How well or
>> poorly
>> > > > either does this has to do more with the power structure that
>> uses ( or
>> > > > misuses) the insights gained.
>> > >
>> > > Insights gained? One gets insight when one uses ones eyes to see
>> (science)
>> > > not when one shuts them (religion). Power structure? Who
>> controls your
>> > > thoughts when you choose to think freely? Who controls your
>> thoughts when
>> > > your a cult member?The Nateman, waiting for the inquisition.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > Nateman, does the term " Pascal's Wager" mean anything to you?
>>
>> > If
>> > you are right, I have no worries. From the primordial slime we
>> came
>> > and to the dust of the grave I shall return. If we are
>> > right....you could be in biggg trouble!
>> > Never mind that the Pope said there was a special place in hell
>> for
>> > Pascal. :)
>>
>> I could not have faith even if I wanted to. It's simply not in my
>> nature. If you
>> think I'm in big trouble check out this guy:
>> http://members.iquest.net/~teevie/sagan.html
>
> Whoops! Screwed the link up . This is the fixed version on top.The
> Nateman

--------------A637247A7274EA17C28A80C2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 

Nathaniel Hall wrote:

 

Nathaniel Hall wrote:

chardin wrote:

> > Date:          Tue, 07 Oct 1997 23:58:40 -0600
> > From:          Nathaniel Hall <natehall@worldnet.att.net>
> > To:            virus@lucifer.com
> > Subject:       Re: virus:Logic
> > Reply-to:      virus@lucifer.com
>
> >
> >
> > Marie Foster wrote:
> >
> > > I am going to risk it and sling in my thoughts about science -
> > > religion.  It seems to me that both are attempts to explain the
> > > existence of the energy we seem to agree exists.  How well or poorly
> > > either does this has to do more with the power structure that uses ( or
> > > misuses) the insights gained.
> >
> > Insights gained? One gets insight when one uses ones eyes to see (science)
> > not when one shuts them (religion). Power structure? Who controls your
> > thoughts when you choose to think freely? Who controls your thoughts when
> > your a cult member?The Nateman, waiting for the inquisition.
> >
> >
> >
> Nateman, does the term " Pascal's Wager" mean anything to you?

> If
> you are right, I have no worries. From the primordial slime we came
> and to the dust of the grave I shall return.   If we are
> right....you  could be in biggg trouble!
> Never mind that the Pope said there was a special place in hell for
> Pascal. :)

I could not have faith even if I wanted to. It's simply not in my nature. If you
think I'm in big trouble check out this guy:
http://members.iquest.net/~teevie/sagan.html

Whoops! Screwed the link up . This is the fixed version on top.The Nateman 
  --------------A637247A7274EA17C28A80C2--