> Trial and error is a very valuable tool, but trial and error comes after
> a concept has been formulated based on observation. In trial and error,
> you still have a starting point, a process and a result.
[clip]
> In order to convince me that astrology was more
> than coincedental, you would need to show some connection other than
> existence itself.
Sounds like you're asking for proof of a hypothesis before you're willing
to conduct an experiment. That's not what you're saying is it?
-Prof. Tim