RE: virus: MS Weapon
Richard Brodie (RBrodie@brodietech.com)
Fri, 10 Oct 1997 12:48:32 -0700
On Friday, October 10, 1997 3:44 AM, Robin Faichney
[SMTP:r.j.faichney@stir.ac.uk] wrote:
> > > A pattern-matching algorithm,
> > > set up to compare scanned-in photos of the cloud and of a
> > > sheep in the appropriate position WRIT viewpoint, with the
> > > M set, will find and match these patterns, because all are
> > > really there.
> >
> > No, your program will find and match those patterns because you have
> > programmed it to do so.
> >
> So it would match *any* pattern it was programmed to find?
> I don't think so. Even if it will only recognize one pattern,
> and doesn't always find that, nevertheless if it does find it
> sometimes -- I mean, strictly, if there is any statistical
> significance to the results -- then how do we account for
> that, if there are no patterns "out there"?
You've lost me. I think the answer you're looking for is that neither we
nor AI programs "find" patterns; rather, we "invent" or "create" patterns
(i.e., labels). The interaction of our hardware and reality causes people
to create similar patterns for similar reality.
>
> More generally, as someone else put it: what does science
> do, if not find consistencies in patterns out there?
>
Science creates predictive theories.
Richard Brodie RBrodie@brodietech.com http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie
Author, VIRUS OF THE MIND: The New Science of the Meme
http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/votm.htm
Visit Meme Central: http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/meme.htm