> > > Your point on "taking up resources that our brighter kids could use"
> > > is way off, however. That viewpoint is socialistic -- which she emphatically
> > > was not.
SKG wrote that last one.
>
>
> Well, explain this last one a little bit more.
> In socialist
> countries EVERYONE has a chance, i.e., a friend of mine who is very
> anti-socialist because he grew up in a socialist country, nonetheless
> had words of praise for the school system.
Sure you have a chance: a chance of being used as a resource rather than repected as a person, a chance
of being a suspect or a labor camp inmate or in the case of socialist China the chance of being an organ
donor prematurely because you happen to have the right genes with a foreigner who needs that organ and is
willing to pay: Laogai Research Foundation (SPECIAL REPORT)
> His point was that the
> resources were spent on all the children. It did not matter if you
> lived in a fairly wealthy neighborhood where the tax base would be
> good as in this country--all the children were taught math, science
> and (and, of course, anti-religion) and when it came time to take class trips--all the children were
> included in sking trips, etc.
In socialist countries education is free and you get what you pay for. The schools here in the United
States are essentially socialist up to the high school level and the socialization of colleges is well
underway. What has it brought us? Rampant gangs where your children fear for their safety. High school
grads who cannot read or write. Socialism taught as gospel truth. If schools were private with this kind
of record do you think they would stay in business for long? The public schools however use their very
failure as an excuse to pour even more money down their festering rat hole! It really doesn't take that
much to educate a child: Home schoolers here in the U.S. fed up with the poor quality of public schools
do a pretty decent job of educating their young even though they are made to pay the taxes for the public
schools which they have chosen not to use. The teachers union fearing rightful extinction responds by
trying to make home schooling illegal! Just another example of the tyranny and failure that will always
result from socialism.
> He is a very independant, capitalistic
> ideals man and was a great admirer of Jack London and his
> works--until I informed him that Jack started the Socialist Party in
> this country--it almost broke his heart. Hardin
>
Never read the fellow. Guess I never will now.The Nateman
--------------5701ACC1B6097AA055B0E662
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
SKG wrote that last one.> > Your point on "taking up resources that our brighter kids could use"
> > is way off, however. That viewpoint is socialistic -- which she emphatically
> > was not.
Well, explain this last one a little bit more.
In socialistSure you have a chance: a chance of being used as a resource rather than repected as a person, a chance of being a suspect or a labor camp inmate or in the case of socialist China the chance of being an organ donor prematurely because you happen to have the right genes with a foreigner who needs that organ and is willing to pay: Laogai Research Foundation (SPECIAL REPORT)
countries EVERYONE has a chance, i.e., a friend of mine who is very
anti-socialist because he grew up in a socialist country, nonetheless
had words of praise for the school system.
His point was that theIn socialist countries education is free and you get what you pay for. The schools here in the United States are essentially socialist up to the high school level and the socialization of colleges is well underway. What has it brought us? Rampant gangs where your children fear for their safety. High school grads who cannot read or write. Socialism taught as gospel truth. If schools were private with this kind of record do you think they would stay in business for long? The public schools however use their very failure as an excuse to pour even more money down their festering rat hole! It really doesn't take that much to educate a child: Home schoolers here in the U.S. fed up with the poor quality of public schools do a pretty decent job of educating their young even though they are made to pay the taxes for the public schools which they have chosen not to use. The teachers union fearing rightful extinction responds by trying to make home schooling illegal! Just another example of the tyranny and failure that will always result from socialism.
resources were spent on all the children. It did not matter if you
lived in a fairly wealthy neighborhood where the tax base would be
good as in this country--all the children were taught math, science
and (and, of course, anti-religion) and when it came time to take class trips--all the children were
included in sking trips, etc.
He is a very independant, capitalisticNever read the fellow. Guess I never will now.The Nateman
ideals man and was a great admirer of Jack London and his
works--until I informed him that Jack started the Socialist Party in
this country--it almost broke his heart. Hardin