Ah, then we are saying the same thing, in our own ways. However, I still
feel Occam needs some solace here- what you are proposing is a deductive
reasoning, and the fact you call it memetic analysis is redundant.
Purist that I am (sure, really...), I still need a meme to be memetic.
*****************
Wade T. Smith
morbius@channel1.com | "There ain't nothin' you
wade_smith@harvard.edu | shouldn't do to a god."
morbius@cyberwarped.com |
******* http://www.channel1.com/users/morbius/ *******